Monday, November 30, 2009
Thanksgiving Dinner
A Southern Thanksgiving
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Thanksgiving Cheer
Inviting? or Stay Away?
The other day my friends and I went to go see a movie at Regal and afterwards we dropped off my friend back at her dorm at Emory. We passed by this restaurant called Lettuce Souprise You and my first though was, "Aww, how clever!" But then I sort of gazed at the restaurant a little too long for its own good and realized how creepy it seemed to be. The name of the restaurant had a witty little play on words that caught my attention but its outer appearance did not look inviting at all. It looked a bit rundown and its location was one I’d be hesitant to step out of the car from. And the only picture I could find online of it doesn’t help its case. I don’t think I want a souprise anymore.
Thanksgiving
Thanksgiving post
I must say, there's just something about being on break from school that just makes a person want to eat more than under the usual circumstances. It's like you just feel more relaxed and food becomes more enjoyable. I'm not sure if it's just me or not, but when I'm stressed I barely have an apptetie and I only eat purely for the sake of eating because I know I will pass out if I don't! I mean it's not too too often that I am THAT stressed but I've noticed my stress level go up since I've started at tech. Needless to say, this thanksgiving break was definitely well deserved and far too short.
On thanksgiving day family and friends came over to my parent's house for dinner. I decided to venture out and try to make pumpkin pie! It was my first attempt at any such thing. The only thing I usually make are pasta dishes and sandwiches. I think my pumpkin pie turned out pretty good considering there were no leftovers from it! That could be though from the fact that everyone was just starving and eating anything in sight. Anyways, here's the recipe that I used. It's super fast and really easy, which was a benefit for a beginner such as myself. I thought perhaps someone else might enjoy it as well!
Pumpkin Pie:
Ingredients
* 1 (15 ounce) can pumpkin
* 1 (14 ounce) can EAGLE BRAND® Sweetened Condensed Milk
* 2 large eggs
* 1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
* 1/2 teaspoon ground ginger
* 1/2 teaspoon ground nutmeg
* 1/2 teaspoon salt
* 1 (9 inch) unbaked pie crust
Directions
1. Preheat oven to 425 degrees F. Whisk pumpkin, sweetened condensed milk, eggs, spices and salt in medium bowl until smooth. Pour into crust. Bake 15 minutes.
2. Reduce oven temperature to 350 degrees F and continue baking 35 to 40 minutes or until knife inserted 1 inch from crust comes out clean. Cool. Garnish as desired. Store leftovers covered in refrigerator.
American Food
I was in Miami during my Thanksgiving break. I thought that I could finally get rid of dining hall for some days, but I was wrong. I figured no matter where I go, I was always surrounded by so-called American food: fries, fried wings, hamburgers. Everyone around me seemed perfectly happy to have the same fries, fried wings and hamburgers with different names. Unfortunately, to me, they all tasted similar to what I had in dining hall. Moreover, when I read US Today, I saw American soldiers in Afganistan were still having fries, fried wings and hamburgers as I did. How powerful is fast food! It makes everyone have the same thing every day.
Thanksgiving
New Family
Desserts
Yummy Shrimp Noodle
My Thanksgiving
This year I felt like my Thanksgiving dinner was smaller than usual. Maybe it was because it was just my immediate family at dinner. We didn't have as much food as I thought we would, but what we did have was delicious. We had a turkey, mashed potatoes, gravy, stuffing/dressing, sweet potatoes (my personal favorite!) , green bean casserole, corn, ambrosia (another one of my favorites), and crescent rolls. It was all so yummy. Here are some pictures of what was left over....
Authentic Chinese food&Turkey
On Thursday, turkey and hot-pot became our lunch and dinner~
As soon as the turkey was taken out of the oven, the kitchen was full of its aroma. Crispy turkey skin shined, inviting us to have a bite.
Hot-pot is my favorite! We had tofu, mushrooms, meat, crab meat, fish balls, needle mushroom and so on. And the hot-pot was indeed spicy enough! Thanks to Jun, we had such a great meal~
For the last day in Jun's house, he made three Sichuan dishes: sliced beef and ox tongue in chilli Sauce, squid with pickled peppers, and boiled beef. they were all spicy dishes, and reminded me of Chengdu, my hometown with countless delicate cuisines.
GALBI
Galbi refers is made with marinated beef shor ribs in a soy sauce based sauce and sauce made from fruit juice (generally Asian pear juice), rice wine, soy sauce, garlic, sesame seed oil and sugar.
* 16 ribs
* 1 cup soy sauce, 3/4 cup sugar, 1/2 cup water
* 1 Asian pear, chopped (or 1/2 Korean pear)
* 1 onion, chopped
* 2 tbsp minced garlic
* 4 tbsp sesame oil
* 1 tbsp ground pepper
* 1 tbsp juice of ginger
1. Wash meat. Rarely but sometimes you can find tiny bone scraps stick to the meat. Soak in water for 1 hour, drain.
2. In a food processor, add chopped onion and pear, puree finely. Pour out to a large bowl, add remaining ingredients, stir.
3. Marinate beef for 8-10 hours or overnight. They cook fairly fast, 2-3 minutes on one side.
4. Traditionally, it is grilled with a wood charcoal but certainly you can grill on a gas stove or out door grill.
resources:
http://www.trifood.com/galbi.html
pictures:
raleighseoulgarden.com
chosdownatlanta.com
Miami's Burger
Thanksgiving is not a festival that Chinese people celebrates, I’ve been to the United States for almost 4 years, I have not figured out the history behind thanksgiving. The only thing I know is eating turkey. I didn’t go back to home at Pittsburgh, instead, I went to Miami with three other friends. One of them is Wade, he is a big time Heat fan, and so we went to watch the game of Heats against the Wizards. Unfortunately, the Heats lost. The day of Thanksgiving, we spent most of the day drive down there. Before the game on Friday, we went to the Miami Beach enjoyed some sunshine, the weather was wonderful. After beach, we ate at a restaurant next to the beach called the Jonny Rockets. I ordered the famous burger, which has two slices of patties, lettuce, mayo, barbecue sauce, as well as my favorite bacons. The burger was very tasty, especially eating the burgers at dinning hall basically everyday, the burger at the Jonny Rockets tasted 10 times better. However, the only drawback is the size of the burger, it was too big, after finishing half the burger, the mayo, lettuce, and barbecue sauce all came out of the burger, it was so difficult to eat it as a whole. I was also surprised that the waitress didn’t ask me how do I want my patties cooked. I normally like to eat the patties well down, the burger came out is well down, so there is nothing too much I can complain.
The vacation was wonderful, but the drive was extremely terrible. Dead week and finals are coming, this trip has energized me spiritually, I hope I can do well on the finals.
Saturday, November 28, 2009
So Kong Dong
My friend Jesse visited me from Athens this Wednesday.
He picked me up from my dorm. I did not go to any of my classes but stayed on campus working on my Blog assignment #4. By the time I was done, it was pretty late. So Jesse and I decided to go get some Korean food from So Kong Dong.
I have introduced So Kong Dong before on this Blog. I am glad that I can actually put up some pictures. I ordered a combo of Tofu Soup and Korean BBQ. They were very satisfying.
Friday, November 27, 2009
Thanksgiving without Turkey
Sweet Potato Casserole
Chicken: The Universal Meat?
The joy of a homecooked meal
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Emerald Chinese Restaurant
Earl's Restaurant @ Square One
The website is below:
http://www.earls.ca/components/com_locations/popups/details.php?cid=39
Lahore Tikka House
Check out their Website:http://www.lahoretikkahouse.com/
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Blog Post 4
Too Much Defense of Food
First of all, one important change in America’s lifestyle and that of the countries that accept the western diet is the development of a less strenuous, more sedentary lifestyle, thus cutting down on the average exercise and physical work that a person must do every day. It is widely known and accepted that daily exercise and frequent physical activity help reduce the chance of cardiovascular diseases and related illnesses. Yet, Michael Pollan never discus’s how the changes in diet over the past 50-60 years have also been accompanied with changes in lifestyle. Yes, Americans have gone from eating the foodstuffs and diets of their native homelands and have switched to a diet heavy on grains and processed nutrient enriched food products, but as an industrialized nation we have also cut down on the amount of time we spend doing any sort of physical activity. Cars have become more common place and newly developed machines and technology have replaced much of the strenuous work and activity that previous generation’s faced. Furthermore, the increased number of sit down office jobs has contributed to America’s sedentary lifestyle, and has led to a less active generation. So, not only has are food changed but the amount of daily activity has also changed over the past several decades and could be even more important to our overall decline in health than what we eat.
Furthermore, countries who have accepted the western diet would have most likely accepted western lifestyle. One of the advantages of the western diet is increased specialization of labor, meaning that less people and workforce are required to produce the amount of food needed by the community, leading to a greater amount of sedentary, sit down, exercise free, office jobs. One example that Pollan uses to support his claim that western diet is the cause of western health problems is a research study in which a group of aborigines, who had been stricken with diabetes and other modern western diseases, after switching to the western diet, decided to venture back “into the bush”. Pollan explains that after several weeks of resuming their aboriginal diet, they were essential cured from all the westernized diseases they had previously suffered. What Pollan forgets to detail, or purposely leaves out, is the dramatic lifestyle changes other than just diet associated with going back “into the bush”. Essentially these aborigines went from living a lifestyle requiring a lot of work and strenuous exercise in order to obtain the daily supplies and food required to live, to a sedentary westernized lifestyle where food is merely bought and possibly cooked, back to their previous lifestyle involving constant exercise and physical exercise. Yet Pollan does mention anything about how the aborigines changed their lives, other than what they ate. So in reality this example, one of Pollans key arguments, does not provide any real concrete evidence to support his theory.
Pollans argument that the change in western diet has led to an overall decline in health in the United States is ineffective because Pollan fails to address the change in daily exercise that has accompanied the change in diet over recent history. Pollans case would be more effective if he addressed this issue instead of avoiding it, as in the case of aborigines. In all, it is Pollans tendency to stir away from all possible counter arguments that subtract from his overall message.
Pollan leaves readers empty handed (blogpost #4)
Michael Pollan has made it clear in his latest book, In Defense of Food, that he is disturbed by the food industries’ health claims and alterations on the food that the public consumes. He presents his audience with a call to action to ignore nutrition experts and advertisers while relying solely on their common sense and innate judgments on food. As his argument fails to convince us to be oblivious to this new age of the food industry and to tune in our primal hunter-gatherer instincts to help guide us, Pollan never presents a feasible solution to, what he calls, the “American Paradox” and, thus, his argument lacks profundity.
“Scientists can argue all they want about the biological mechanisms behind this phenomenon, but whichever it is, the solution to the problem would appear to remain very much the same: Stop eating a Western diet.” (140-141). Firstly, this is just one of several generalizations Pollan makes throughout his book. He generalizes the Western diet to consist of “lots of processed foods and meat, lots of added fat and sugar, lots of everything except fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.” (89) He further discusses the negative impact of the Western diet by contrasting it with the diets of those in Africa, India, among the Eskimos in Labrador, among the Native Americans, and among several more different groups all over the world. He applauds the diets of the other groups by pointing out the almost complete absence of chronic diseases that had become commonplace in the West. He fails to acknowledge the fact that most of the inhabitants in these regions are not as fortunate as those in the U.S. Food is not as readily accessible to these people and therefore, the likelihood of these people to attain food related diseases is less simply due to the fact that they consume less. He does not describe to us what makes the diet of these people better; he assumes that these more backward societies would have more traditional lifestyles making their food options less tainted by the evils of modern science.
Pollan wrote his book in hopes of improving the health of others, but his advice proved impractical for many of us who live in the current day. He advises us to avoid certain ingredients, food products that make health claims, and to get out of the supermarket whenever possible. A typical American family living in Suburbia or in the city would find all of these tips hard to follow religiously when what Pollan demands us to avoid is clearly inevitable. It’s hard to walk down an aisle in the supermarket without finding a product that does not make health claims nor contain a sinful ingredient. Supermarkets have become the main food provider for many homes. Pollan’s alternative: Whole foods, Farmer’s Markets, or a garden. These food providers don’t live up to the convenience of the local supermarket found every few miles or so in most cities and suburbs. And the costs of shopping at these locations would break the budgets of many American families.
Though Pollan suggests many possible ways to help us eat healthier and states an abundance of facts to support his claims, he leaves his audience unable to follow through with his advice and leaves many other vital facts unacknowledged. To change the lifestyle and eating habits of a whole region is a bold thing to encounter. Unfortunately, Pollan fell short with his argument and left his readers unconvinced.
Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food. New York : Penguin Books Ltd, 2008.
Blog Post #4: Pollan Falls Short.
The author defines the main features of the “Western Diet” as containing “lots of processed foods and meat, lots of added fat and sugar, [and] lots of everything except fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.” Most people can understand where Pollan is coming from as they think of the “Western Diet.” After all, those two words alone cause instantaneous images to come forth in one’s mind of fast food chains such as McDonald’s ® and Burger Kind ® and greasy and artery clogging foods such as those served at waffle house and various other food establishments. Although Pollan supplies many facts about his claim, he fails to truly convince his audience. Instead of gaining readers’ support he loses it just as one loses his shirt in a messy divorce. Nothing worth having comes out of a messy divorce and the same can be said for Pollan’s argument.
A major flaw in the argument is that Pollan generalizes his claim too much. He organizes his argument to make it seem like every single American follows what he considers as the “Western Diet.” This mistake comes from the fact that processed foods and fast food chains are what are seen right in front of our eyes, everywhere we look. What we see before our eyes, however, is not always the complete truth. Not every American follows that specific “Western Diet.” From person to person, a different definition for the Western Diet exists.
Besides the fact that Pollan generalizes his case, his most significant mistake occurs when he fails to recognize the other side of his argument. This is to say that he does not take the time to identify the benefits of processed food. This causes him to lose credibility from his potential supporters. Processed foods do actually possess quite a few advantages over organic foods. First benefit, it is cheaper for a country as large and populated as the United States to make processed foods as opposed to organic foods. Organic food requires an abundant amount of money and energy to grow and it is sometimes a waste when that money and energy can be utilized on more useful resources. Second benefit, processed foods are convenient and available everywhere. Yes, processed foods may not be the healthiest option, but it is definitely not the worst. Processed food eaten in appropriate proportions and mixed in with some organic foods is actually pretty healthy. Keep in mind when eating processed food, too much of a good thing becomes a bad thing.
Pollan makes it seem that all that is required of a person to be healthy is to just eat organic food. That is completely false. On the last page of “In Defense of Food” Pollan ends his claim by writing, “The cook in the kitchen preparing a meal from plants and animals at the end of this shortest of food chains has a great many things to worry about, but ‘health’ is simply not one of them, because it is given.” Most doctors will agree that eating organic foods might be the “healthier” option, but it is not going to lead a person to direct health. Real health comes from both diet and exercise. Pollan mentions nothing about exercise in his drawn out book.
Although Pollan’s book is filled with an overwhelming amount of facts to support his claim, he falls short in succeeding to convince his audience. He chooses quantity of facts rather than quality of facts for his book and this trick is evident as one approaches the end of Pollan’s “In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto.”
Blog Post #4
In the era of warfare, the importance of food was emphasized. In contrast with the modernization of society and prosperity of technology, the development of the food industry and food products offer the consumers beyond basic food. The avant-guard author Michael Pollan wrote the book “In Defense of Food” to share his insights on the current American’s diet as well as how the nutritional values of the food sold in the market related to the health of the consumers. In the book, one of the arguments that Pollan focused on was the eating trend of western diet, and how the consumer becomes the victim of the modern food industry’s civilization.
American Society's Relience on Nutritionists
In Michael Pollan's latest book, In Defense of Food, Pollan argues that as a society, American's depend on the views and theories of nutritionists and scientists overly much. We look at food labels, nutrition facts, articles, and periodicals. Pollan believes that we should learn to eat correctly ourselves. However, Pollan contradicts himself in the book, giving out his rules to follow.
Pollan begins the book by making the claim that any "packages elaborately festooned with health claims (Pollan 2)" should be avoided on the basis that it is not really "food". These labels are done by nutritionists and scientists that have prepared these foods to contain, or not contain, certain things, such as vitamins, nutrients, and cholesterol. This in itself both points to his argument and contradicts it. He is telling us the fact hoping to broaden our perspective, while also telling us something that we should do.
Pollan spends an entire chapter in his book, simply describing how far off the science is from being accurate, beginning on page 61. In the way Pollan describes the science, taking the nutrient completely out of its environment to study how it reacts with different ingredients, he shows just how wrong the scientists are. He states "it takes the nutrient out of the context of the food, the food out of the context of the diet, and diet out of the context of the lifestyle (Pollan 62)". According to Pollan, it is wrong because a nutrient will react differently when it is in the food, then when it is out of the food, and when combined with other foods. In this chapter Pollan does a good job of not contradicting himself, not really giving out advice to follow, other than proving his point that the way this science is being done nothing.
Pollan than makes the mistake of writing two entire sections describing his own rules to follow. The first one starts on page 161 and is telling us, the readers, what to eat. He tells us things like "eat like an omnivore" and "eat mostly plants, especially leaves", "eat wild foods when you can" and the one that really gets me "eat more like the French, or the Italians, or the Japanese. Or the Indians. Or the Greeks." The last one is a not great advice at all. Just because something works for one group of people, doesn't mean it'll work for everyone, notice how those listed all eat differently. Everyone has different make-ups, different life-styles, and different likes and dislikes. For example, a Marine can't eat like the French all of the time, because most of his meals are taken out in the field, with MREs (meals ready to eat) that are packed with calories. A Marine in the field doesn't have the time to sit back and take his time to eat his meal.
For his second section, which starts on page 183, Pollan discusses how to eat. This section includes advice such as, "paying more, eating less", "do all of your eating at a table, don't get your fuel from the same place your car does", "consult your gut", and "eat slowly". Some of these make since, but still he is contradicting his original philosophy of figuring out your own method of eating. Pollan is trying to get everyone to follow his steps.
Pollan successfully manages to convince people not to trust nutritionists and scientists, but he fails at his attempt to make America self-reliant, as he gives out his advice in, and at the end, of the book.
Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto. New York: Penguin Books, 2008.
Blog Post #4
Blog Post #4
In the book, In Defense of Food, Michael Pollan centers many of his arguments around the “Western Diet.” He defines the western diet as consuming “lots of processed foods and meats, lots of added fat and sugar, lots of everything except fruits, vegetables, and whole grains” (page 89). In actuality however, this isn’t what most “Westerners” eat. If by western he is referring to the western hemisphere then he is leaving out many different cultures and people. What about Canada? Mexico? The rest of Central and South America? Do those people not count as Westerners too?
Pollan is more or less referring to Americans when he references the Western diet. Probably on average more Americans eat a processed diet than don’t, but not all Americans eat this way. There is still a large group of people who try to stay away from having a diet consisting solely on processed foods. More people these days are going the organic route, but price and availability are deterrents for some. Also, even people who do cook meals at home can’t completely stay away from all processed foods. According to Pollan, most of what we eat is made of corn, and it is. Many food and food products we eat and use contain high fructose corn syrup. It’s hard to stay away from it.
So even if we need to get away from the Western diet to improve our health and lives it’s going to be very difficult and probably won’t happen in our lifetime. This whole culture of relying on processed foods is too ingrained. It’s going to take a big catastrophe to finally convince people “enriched”, “lowfat”, and “fortified” foods aren’t all the good they’re cracked up to be. Pollan’s argument to “Eat food. Mostly plants. Not too much.” is simple enough, and possible, but when he goes on to explain what food to eat it becomes more complicated.
It really seems like the average consumer has little choice in what they eat. Even if people want to eat a healthier, less Western diet, it’s going to be very hard. There really is no escape from “processed food land.” I’ve talked to a nutritionist before and her advice was everything you need in the grocery store is on the outside perimeter. Your fruits, vegetables, meats, and dairies are all on the walls. Don’t even go into the center aisles except for your breads and (healthy!) cereals. No junk food, no frozen food, no processed food.
Even with this advice however, even our meats and vegetables are processed. The cows we get our meat from are fed on pastures that were probably fertilized, were fed a diet rich in corn and supplements, and injected with hormones and antibiotics. So the products we think are relatively organic and free from processing are just as processed as the sugary, low cholesterol, lowfat breakfast cereals we’ve come to associate with “bad foods.” Our vegetables and fruits are genetically altered to produce high yield corn, two inch across strawberries, and large bunches of broccoli, all at the cost of poor nutrition.
Pollan makes some great arguments, but the truth is, not many of them are well supported. The “Western diet” (however untrue that title may be) is what it is because there aren’t many alternatives. Pollan’s logic in his argument that people can change the food industry isn’t even plausible. People are going to eat what they are given as long as they aren’t directly dying from it. It also doesn’t help that they are being told what they are eating is healthy and good for them even if it might not be. Pollan makes arguments, tries to back them up, but in reality they are relatively weak. Sure he has lots of evidence but the logic of it just doesn’t hold. The state of the people who eat the Western diet are perfectly okay with what they are eating, otherwise they might try to change it.
Blog Post #4
It is interesting how in a country obsessed with health, the number cases of diabetes, high blood pressure, and other ailments seems to be on the rise. Maybe Pollan is right in stating that the public can’t just go by a label that says “new and improved with extra vitamins” on a breakfast bar. Would it be possible to eat healthy all the time in society today? Maybe, but it would be difficult. However, the point Pollan seems to be making is not to give up ones day job and become a farmer to provide vittles for one’s family. He just wants everyone to take a look at how and what they are eating and make better choices. It seems to be clear enough to understand. However, it can bring people onto the defensive for several reasons. For one, lifestyle changes are difficult. Also, there are many food industries that have more to gain from the public, financially, when their eating habits are still non stellar. Along with that, the health industry itself is a huge money making machine that stands to gain more if their expertise is “needed” by the public to help them figure out how to get healthy.
“Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” Pollan is basically stating that there is no great secret to better health. The fact is it is just that easy-and that difficult. So instead of taking a vitamin that has the same nutritional value as a serving of broccoli, eat a piece of broccoli. Hard to do that in a car on the way to work? Then reserve time in the day to eat at home, as a family. Now there is a concept! The benefits to this will not only bring physical health but emotional and familial health as well- an added benefit. Pollan is correct in his suggestion that more time spent on preparing and eating foods will give betterment to the lives of those willing to put in the effort. The health of the eater would improve and maybe his or her family relationships would too and that would be the icing on the cake.
Not strong enough to defend his food...
In his current book his organizational way of writing, in which he meticulously makes an index with each and every chapter talking about a specific detail might educate the reader in some way but his writing is flawed in logic.
As a reader we have the right to have our opinions and ideas. When an author wants to put his point across he should try and convince the reader as to why his opinion is the right opinion rather than force his opinion. In the 21st century many people would defend Pollans argument saying that the world has gone into the hands of the supermarket tyrants, processed food giants but if thought about it, doesn’t anyone understand that we ourselves allowed them to develop. He argues that there are more diseases now than ever, people are unhappy now more than ever and he points his finger straight towards the so called “western culture”. But is it only the western culture that is responsible? And how is it that only the Americans constitute the “western culture”?
Being a non-western myself I know that these problems are faced in other countries as well. Obesity, hypertension and other `diet’ related diseases are there in other countries because of their staple diet and junk food intake, not just because they have started to follow the American culture. The main reason as to why people were fit during our grandparents age was because of their lifestyle. They had to do more physical work while we tend to have a more of a sedentary lifestyle. So it’s the way we live our lives that decides our health now rather than how much of processed food we eat.
As a reader one major drawback I found in his writing was that he kept on giving scientific facts. While proving a point it is necessary to give evidence for your stance however too much of plain scientific talk like in Pollans book fails to stimulate the readers mind as the reader looses interest in the subject itself. For example when he talks about the various acids or risk factors for CHD or even the general surveys. These facts are either unnecessary or too hard to follow for a simple man.
The other factor that was a drawback in Pollans argument was that he was not able to justify his counterarguments. He seemed to beat around the bush by just providing the facts and scientific knowledge. In today’s world people buy the things that they like. People have grown up eating all sorts of food and have made the conscious decision as to how much of organic food has to be eaten and how much of processed food. The government bodies that check and make sure that the food put up in the markets is eatable and good are set up for a reason. Even though the food might be genetically engineered and processed it is still food which can be eaten. These industries only flourish because there’s a demand for them so technically we are not forced into eating the processed food we actually prefer it.
In conclusion Pollan shows that he has strong ideals, however he fails to put his point across to us readers. In all if the world itself is happy with what they eat and how they live then why would they want to change their lifestyle?
Take Pollan With a Grain of Salt
For one thing, Michael Pollan believes that Western culture is only America. His argument is always geared toward an American audience, but simply refers to his audience as the ‘Western culture.’ His broad generalization is inconsiderate and rude. Pollan even states that we should have a Greek diet even though one would normally consider Greece as part of Western culture. It is almost as though Pollan believes that Western culture is the only technologically advanced culture and therefore the only producer processed food. He continuously mentions how all other ‘cultures’ eat better because of their lack processed food. This is disrespectful to those countries that he considers less-advanced, but with better diets.
In Pollan’s In Defense of Food the author throws plenty of random statistical data at the reader to persuade the reader that his argument is without fault and impossible to question. One may fall for his tricks, but I have not. I have noticed that the data he provides (especially about rising obesity) could be cause by a lot more than our abundance of processed food. For example, as an economy, such as America, grows people become wealthier and therefore more able to afford all the food that they so desire. This abundance of food in our homes can easily be the cause for rising obesity rates. I, however, am not writing a book to persuade readers to think so.
Eventually, Pollan begins to ramble about why our ‘Western’ diet is so unhealthy. He mentions chemicals and preservatives in food and how most of our crops these days are from genetically engineered seeds. My question is, “What is the problem?” All foods available on the market today have been tested to be perfectly safe by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Even though the idea of ‘fake’ and ‘engineered’ food may sound questionable they have all been proven safe. Pollan’s argument that anything non-organic is unhealthy is quite skewed.
Also, Pollan continuously makes blanket statements that our ‘Western’ culture (really he means Americans) diet consists of nothing other than processed, genetically-engineered food. Obviously, not everyone in this country is obese. Not everyone eats at McDonald’s everyday. There are plenty of people throughout the country that are happy and healthy without any extremist advice from Michael Pollan. I merely urge readers of Michael Pollan’s In Defense of Food to be cautious when deciding whether or not his arguments are sound and to be taken seriously or as just a fun, out-of-the-box read.